Step-by-step reduction of travertine porosity using low soluble inorganic salts

Rihana Terziu, Mihane Dauti,Kledi Xhaxhiu,and Edlira Baraj


In the present study the treatment by three chemical solutions (5%) of travertine is considered. The overall process assumes the structural pore reduction due to the continuous controlled crystallization of low soluble inorganic salts such as calcium sulfate and calcium oxalate. Travertine samples of monolithic blocks of Turkish origin previously cut in form of parallelepiped blocs with length of 25 ± 1mm, width and thickness of 7 mm are employed in this study. The prepared samples were dipped in distilled water for 2-3 hours followed by drying up to 6 hours at 70 °C, 6 hours at 100 °C and 12 hours to 125 °C. Consolidation of travertine samples is carried out by treatment in three stages: the first stage involves treatment with calcium acetate (Ca(CH3COO)2• H2O), the second stage involves the treatment with ammonium sulphate (NH4)2SO4 followed by the third stage includes the treatment with ammonium oxalate (NH4)2C2O4•H2O. The decreasing of porosity and surface area is monitored by continuous gravimetric measurements followed by gas- and mercury porosimetry measurements. After each treatment, the sample weight increases and its porosity decreases. All samples were subject of: 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 treatments respectively.

1. Saff et YAGIZ. Travertine as Construction and BuildingMaterial. Economy-Management2010, 667-673.
2. Bruce W. Fouke; Jack D. Farmer; David J. Des Marais. Depositional facies and aqueous solidgeochemistryof travertine-depositing hot springs (angel terrace, mammoth hot springs, yellowstonenationalpark, u.s.a.). Journal Of Sedimentary Research2000,70 , 565–585.
3. M. Matteini. Conservation of stone monuments and artifacts: new possibilities off ered by the ammonium oxalate based treatment. International Meeting on Science and Technology for Cultural Heritage2007.
4. Rodríguez-Gordillo J.; Sáez-Pérez M.P. Eff ects of thermal changes on Macael marble: Experimental study.Construction and Building Materials Journal2006 , 6, 355-365.
5. Sudeep M. R; Cathy S. Scotto; C. Jeff rey Brinker; Development of a surface-specifi c, anti-weathering stone preservative treatment.Advances in architectures series1997, 3, 233-242.
6. I. Karatasios; P. Th eoulakis; A. Kalagri; A. Sapalidis; V. Kilikoglou. Evaluation of consolidation treatments of marly limestones used in archaeological monuments. Construction and Building Materials2009, 23, 2803-2812.
7. Katarina Malaga-Starzec; Jan E. Lindqvist; BjörnSchouenborg. Experimental study on the variation in porosity of marble as a function of temperature.Th e Geological Society2002, 205, 81-88.
8. Robert C. HCR Handbook of chemistry and Physics, 59-th Ed; Publisher: CRC Press, Port Huron, Michigan, United States, 1973, pp 67-187.



pdfPDF